Hear the case
A narrated, illustrated case file: two sides, one dispute, under a minute to absorb.
The 1L six
Every case ships with its own court-sketch exhibit: ink and gouache, straight from the file.
Civil Procedure
Constitutional Law
Contracts
Criminal Law
Property
TortsHow it works
A narrated, illustrated case file: two sides, one dispute, under a minute to absorb.
Argue it like a judge from the bench: your ruling, your reasons, the authority you rely on, spoken in your own words.
A rubric-graded scorecard across six categories, with feedback quote-traced to what you actually said.
The method
Feynman’s test for real understanding was to explain a thing in plain words, out loud, until the gaps show. That is the whole exercise here. There is no multiple choice to hide behind, just the facts, your ruling, and the reasons you have to say in your own words.
And you can say it freely. Your ruling is transcribed on your iPhone: the recording never leaves the device, and we receive the text, not the audio. You read that text, fix anything misheard, and nothing is scored until you approve it.
Prefer to type? Every ruling can be typed instead of spoken, and is scored identically.
The habit
Small enough to keep, hard enough to count. One free case a day, one attempt, no retries, then it’s done and you get on with your evening. The streak is the point: miss more than a day and it goes back to one, and there is no repair.
Everyone rules on the same facts that day. Once enough judges have ruled, you can see where your score landed against the rest of the docket.
The feedback
Your Mastery Map. Six axes, one for each 1L area, drawn from how you have actually been ruling. The shape grows outward as your reasoning gets stronger, and a gold ring marks the line where an area counts as mastered, so a weak corner is obvious at a glance.
The leaderboard. A weekly board of the top judges by XP earned that week, reset every Monday, plus a standing showcase of the highest careers on the bench. Claim a username and you are on it, subscription or not. Your own row travels with you, ranked or not.
The authority
Every case is invented. Every authority behind its rubric is a real, decided court case, and it has to prove it before the case is ever published: the citation must resolve to a real court record and the case name must match that record. If it doesn’t, the case is thrown out and written again rather than quietly patched.
Your feedback is held to the same standard. It quotes your own words back to you, and every quote is checked against what you actually said before you ever see it, then points at the authority your reasoning should have leaned on.
Every practice ruling earns XP, and XP is the whole ladder, from Law Clerk to Chief Justice. How well you rule sets how fast you climb.
All cases are fictional. The precedent cited in feedback is real, verified case law, but nothing here applies to your situation.